Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Howard v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

State ex rel. Howard v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

96 Ohio St. 3d 200
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 21, 2002
DocketNo. 2002-0012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 Ohio St. 3d 200 (State ex rel. Howard v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Howard v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, 96 Ohio St. 3d 200 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Eastman & Smith Ltd., Thomas A. Nixon and Margaret M. Sturgeon, for appellee Seaway Foodtown, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Howard v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.
2002 Ohio 4097 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 Ohio St. 3d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-howard-v-ohio-bureau-of-workers-compensation-ohio-2002.