State ex rel. Howard v. McDonald
This text of 777 N.E.2d 268 (State ex rel. Howard v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus. On answer of respondent the Honorable Frederick H. McDonald, motion for judgment on pleadings of the Honorable Frederick H. McDonald, motion for summary judgment, motion to dismiss of Michael Vanderhorst, motion to dismiss of James S. Nowak, motion to dismiss of Jonathan Coughlan, motion to dismiss of Anthony Georgetti, counsel for Yark Automotive Group, Inc., motion to dismiss of Thomas A. Dixon, and motion for default judgment. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
777 N.E.2d 268, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-howard-v-mcdonald-ohio-2002.