State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 167, 83 Ohio St. 3d 98

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 9, 1998

Docket1996-0463

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 167 (State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 167, 83 Ohio St. 3d 98 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 98.]

[THE STATE EX REL.] HOWARD, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-167.] Workers’ compensation—Judgment reversed on authority of State ex rel. Tapp v. Parsec, Inc. (No. 96-463—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided September 9, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD03-329. __________________ White, Getgey & Meyer Co., L.P.A., and Barbara F. Florez, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State ex rel. Tapp v. Parsec, Inc. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 417, 696 N.E.2d 591, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 98.]

[THE STATE EX REL.] HOWARD, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-167.] Workers’ compensation—Judgment reversed on authority of State ex rel. Tapp v. Parsec, Inc. (No. 96-463—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided September 9, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD03-329. __________________ White, Getgey & Meyer Co., L.P.A., and Barbara F. Florez, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State ex rel. Tapp v. Parsec, Inc. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 417, 696 N.E.2d 591, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 167, 83 Ohio St. 3d 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-howard-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack