State ex rel. Howard v. Criminal District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Howard v. Criminal District Court

638 So. 2d 1071, 1994 La. LEXIS 1574, 1994 WL 270840

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 13, 1994·No. No. 94-KH-1045·Published

Opinion

In re Howard, Clinton C., Jr.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 231-414, 231-415.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for reconsideration he filed on or about February 15, 1994. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the [1072]*1072district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with copy of its judgment.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Howard, Clinton C., Jr.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 231-414, 231-415.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for reconsideration he filed on or about February 15, 1994. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the [1072]*1072district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with copy of its judgment.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

State ex rel. Howard v. Criminal District Court, 638 So. 2d 1071, 1994 La. LEXIS 1574, 1994 WL 270840 (La. 1994).

Pincite

638 So. 2d 1071 (State ex rel. Howard v. Criminal District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.