State ex rel. Hood v. Wall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hood v. Wall

625 So. 2d 153, 1993 La. LEXIS 2734, 1993 WL 391021

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 24, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-2434·Published

Opinion

In re Hood, Albert; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW93 1545; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 102231.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed more than 60 days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hood, Albert; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW93 1545; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 102231.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed more than 60 days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

State ex rel. Hood v. Wall, 625 So. 2d 153, 1993 La. LEXIS 2734, 1993 WL 391021 (La. 1993).

Pincite

625 So. 2d 153 (State ex rel. Hood v. Wall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.