State ex rel. Homelite Corp. v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Homelite Corp. v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District

374 P.2d 113, 140 Mont. 616, 1962 Mont. LEXIS 113

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 14, 1962

DocketNo. 10451

StatusPublished

This text of 374 P.2d 113 (State ex rel. Homelite Corp. v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Homelite Corp. v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, 374 P.2d 113, 140 Mont. 616, 1962 Mont. LEXIS 113 (Mo. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court that the Honorable Emmet Glore has disqualified himself in the case of Lee Roy Thomas and Sylvia Thomas v. Homelite Corporation pending in the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Montana, in and for the County of Missoula, and has remanded said cause to the Honorable E. Gardner Brownlee for further proceedings, and that the petition for writ filed herein has become moot; and

It being necessary to have further time to call in another judge or judges to assume jurisdiction, which necessarily will require further extensions of time for the purpose of hearing the motion for new trial, this cause will remain in abeyance in this Court until such time as a duly qualified District Judge assumes and exercises jurisdiction of the cause in the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court that the Honorable Emmet Glore has disqualified himself in the case of Lee Roy Thomas and Sylvia Thomas v. Homelite Corporation pending in the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Montana, in and for the County of Missoula, and has remanded said cause to the Honorable E. Gardner Brownlee for further proceedings, and that the petition for writ filed herein has become moot; and

It being necessary to have further time to call in another judge or judges to assume jurisdiction, which necessarily will require further extensions of time for the purpose of hearing the motion for new trial, this cause will remain in abeyance in this Court until such time as a duly qualified District Judge assumes and exercises jurisdiction of the cause in the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 P.2d 113, 140 Mont. 616, 1962 Mont. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-homelite-corp-v-district-court-of-the-fourth-judicial-mont-1962.