State ex rel. Holly v. Criminal District Court
Opinion
In re Holly, Fonnie; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 16,151.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed in March, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
588 So. 2d 1103 (State ex rel. Holly v. Criminal District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.