State ex rel. Hollis v. Moreau

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hollis v. Moreau

531 So. 2d 279, 1988 La. LEXIS 2444, 1988 WL 102499

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 3, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KH-2285

StatusPublished

This text of 531 So. 2d 279 (State ex rel. Hollis v. Moreau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hollis v. Moreau, 531 So. 2d 279, 1988 La. LEXIS 2444, 1988 WL 102499 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hollis, Donald Ray; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW88 1346; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. '482-471, 5-81-188.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hollis, Donald Ray; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW88 1346; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. '482-471, 5-81-188.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

531 So. 2d 279, 1988 La. LEXIS 2444, 1988 WL 102499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hollis-v-moreau-la-1988.