State ex rel. Hollingsworth v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hollingsworth v. State

572 So. 2d 82, 1991 La. LEXIS 99, 1991 WL 1774

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 11, 1991

DocketNo. 90-KH-2585

StatusPublished

This text of 572 So. 2d 82 (State ex rel. Hollingsworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hollingsworth v. State, 572 So. 2d 82, 1991 La. LEXIS 99, 1991 WL 1774 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hollingsworth, Roy; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus; supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 321-123.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for pqst conviction relief on or about July 5, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hollingsworth, Roy; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus; supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 321-123.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for pqst conviction relief on or about July 5, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 So. 2d 82, 1991 La. LEXIS 99, 1991 WL 1774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hollingsworth-v-state-la-1991.