State Ex Rel. Holliday v. Wetherald

190 N.E. 246, 127 Ohio St. 599, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 599, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 377
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 1934
Docket24629
StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.E. 246 (State Ex Rel. Holliday v. Wetherald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Holliday v. Wetherald, 190 N.E. 246, 127 Ohio St. 599, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 599, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 377 (Ohio 1934).

Opinion

This cause came on to he heard upon the pleadings, the evidence and the arguments of counsel. Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that a writ of prohibition be denied, and that the action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed at the costs of the relator, upon the authority of Silliman v. Court of Common Pleas of Williams County, 126 Ohio St., 338.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silliman v. Court of Common Pleas
185 N.E. 420 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 N.E. 246, 127 Ohio St. 599, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 599, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-holliday-v-wetherald-ohio-1934.