State ex rel. Hoag v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections

923 N.E.2d 619, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1518
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 23, 2010
Docket2010-0488
StatusPublished

This text of 923 N.E.2d 619 (State ex rel. Hoag v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hoag v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections, 923 N.E.2d 619, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1518 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of the Lucas County Republican Party and John Lavelle’s motion for leave to intervene as respondents,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 N.E.2d 619, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hoag-v-lucas-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2010.