State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections
579 N.E.2d 210, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 4269
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Ohio St. 3d 1433 →
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the motions of Cooker Restaurant et al. and the city of Westerville for leave to file briefs amici curiae, the motion of Bob Taft, Secretary of State, for leave to intervene, and respondent’s motion to compel discovery,
[1437]*1437IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motions be, and the same are hereby, granted, effective October 18, 1991.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections, 579 N.E.2d 210, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 4269 (Ohio 1991).
579 N.E.2d 210 (State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.