State ex rel. Hinchey v. Allyn

Washington Supreme Court

State ex rel. Hinchey v. Allyn

34 P. 914, 7 Wash. 285, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 139

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 17, 1893

DocketNo. 1125

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 34 P. 914 (State ex rel. Hinchey v. Allyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hinchey v. Allyn, 34 P. 914, 7 Wash. 285, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 139 (Wash. 1893).

Pincite

Opinions

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

A judge of the superior court whose term of office expired on the second Monday of January, 1893, cannot be required- by mandamus to settle and certify a statement of facts on appeal after the expiration of his term. [286]*286The act of January 21,1893 (Laws, p. 6), does not purport to do more than to authorize the ex-judges to settle- and certify, it does not, and could not, require them to do anything.

The application for a writ in this case is, therefore, denied.

Dunbar, C. J., and Hoyt, J., concur.

Scott, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI