State ex rel. Hillman v. Franklin Cty. Appellate Court Judges

2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 906, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1404
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 26, 2017
Docket2017-0626
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 6964 (State ex rel. Hillman v. Franklin Cty. Appellate Court Judges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hillman v. Franklin Cty. Appellate Court Judges, 2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 906, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 2017).

Opinion

In Prohibition. On relator’s motion for leave to supplement complaint. Motion denied. On respondents’ motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed. On relator’s request to relieve him from electronic filing. Request denied. On respondents’ motion to stay discovery. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur. French, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and would grant relator’s motion for leave to supplement complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 906, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hillman-v-franklin-cty-appellate-court-judges-ohio-2017.