State ex rel. Hilliard v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hilliard v. State

157 So. 3d 586, 2015 La. LEXIS 86, 2015 WL 357958

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 9, 2015

DocketNo. 2015-KH-0023

StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 3d 586 (State ex rel. Hilliard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hilliard v. State, 157 So. 3d 586, 2015 La. LEXIS 86, 2015 WL 357958 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Robert Hilliard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 272-836.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction he submitted on or about March 18, 2013 and a supplemental application for post-conviction he submitted on or about December 9, 2013. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the post-conviction application and supplemental post-conviction application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Robert Hilliard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 272-836.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction he submitted on or about March 18, 2013 and a supplemental application for post-conviction he submitted on or about December 9, 2013. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the post-conviction application and supplemental post-conviction application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 So. 3d 586, 2015 La. LEXIS 86, 2015 WL 357958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hilliard-v-state-la-2015.