State Ex Rel. Hile v. Zangerle

9 N.E.2d 292, 132 Ohio St. 523, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 523, 8 Ohio Op. 499, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 206
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1937
Docket26474
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 9 N.E.2d 292 (State Ex Rel. Hile v. Zangerle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Hile v. Zangerle, 9 N.E.2d 292, 132 Ohio St. 523, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 523, 8 Ohio Op. 499, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 206 (Ohio 1937).

Opinion

By the Court.

Relator, as a taxpayer, seeks a writ of mandamus from this court to compel the county auditor to levy a tax on all the property possessed or controlled by the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District.

The Tax Commission demurred to the petition on the ground of misjoinder of parties, and the relator in open court conceded that that demurrer should be sustained.

The Metropolitan Park District filed a separate answer.

The County Auditor and the Board of County Commissioners filed a joint answer, to which the relator interposed a demurrer.

A demurrer searches the entire record, and therefore in this case reaches the petition. 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 781, Section 202; Trott v. Sarchett, 10 Ohio St., 241; State, ex rel. Hartford Life Ins. Co., v. Douds, 96 Ohio St., 604, 118 N. E., 1086; State, ex rel. Deal, v. In *524 dustrial Commission, 120 Ohio St., 269, 166 N. E., 198.

Mandamus is an extraordinary writ which will issue only when there is no other adequate remedy at law.

Section 5616, General Code, authorizes a taxpayer to file a complaint against an exemption of property from taxation and Section 5611-2, General Code, provides for appeal to the Court of Common Pleas.

The relator having another adequate remedy at law, a wjrit of mandamus will be denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Zimmerman, Williams and Myers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harp v. Cope United Methodist Home
278 N.E.2d 349 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of Berea
218 N.E.2d 428 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1966)
Ross v. Cincinnati Transit Co.
136 N.E.2d 760 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1956)
State ex rel. Hepperla v. Glander
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 59 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
Galion v. Galion
97 N.E.2d 68 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)
State, Ex Rel. Hepperla v. Glander
114 N.E.2d 753 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 N.E.2d 292, 132 Ohio St. 523, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 523, 8 Ohio Op. 499, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hile-v-zangerle-ohio-1937.