State ex rel. Hetzel v. Board of Commissioners

8 Nev. 309
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Belknap, J.:

Application for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the county commissioners of Eureka County to order an election as provided by the terms of- the act creating the County of Eureka. Section three of said act directs that if on or before the first Monday in July, A. d. 1873, five hundred or more of the qualified electors of the County of Eureka petition the board of county commissioners to order an election for county officers, it shall be the duty of said board to call an election for that purpose to be held on the first Monday in August, A. d. 1873. Before ordering an election two facts are to be ascertained: 1st, whether five hundred persons have petitioned; and 2d, whether they are qualified electors. It is evident that these facts must be determined by the commissioners acting judicially, and we cannot direct the particular decision they shall reach. They must determine the questions presented to them by the dictates of their own judgment.

The writ of mandamus lies to compel an inferior tribunal or board to exercise its judgment and render a decision where a failure of justice would otherwise result from delay or refusal to act. In this case action was taken by the commissioners. Their conclusion may be reviewed and if erroneous corrected, but not by this process.

The application for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Hetzel v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Nev. 309 (Neb. 1873).

8 Nev. 309 (State ex rel. Hetzel v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada
994 P.2d 692 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)
State v. Ruggeri
429 P.2d 969 (Utah Supreme Court, 1967)
Wilmurth v. First Judicial District Court
393 P.2d 302 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1964)
State ex rel. Weber v. McFadden
205 P. 594 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1922)
People ex rel. Giese v. Dillon
266 Ill. 272 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1914)
Boynton v. Brown
164 S.W. 893 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
State ex rel. Holley v. Boerlin
30 Nev. 473 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1908)
State Ex Rel. Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Curler
67 P. 1075 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1902)
Hardin v. Guthrie
66 P. 744 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1901)
State Ex Rel. Huffaker v. Crosby
50 P. 127 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1897)
Godchaux v. Carpenter
19 Nev. 415 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1887)