State ex rel. Hess v. State, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hess v. State, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal

551 So. 2d 1327, 1989 La. LEXIS 2597, 1989 WL 136516

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 10, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-2175

StatusPublished

This text of 551 So. 2d 1327 (State ex rel. Hess v. State, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hess v. State, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, 551 So. 2d 1327, 1989 La. LEXIS 2597, 1989 WL 136516 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hess, Gene R. Sr.; Hess, Gene R. Jr.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Plaque-mines, 25th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89KW-1667.

Denied. Relators’ request for mandamus is moot as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal has acted. However, we note that relators use offensive, discourteous and insulting language in referring to the trial judge and the court of appeal in violation of Louisiana Supreme Court Rule 7, § 7. Although we now decline to hold relators, pro se litigants, in contempt of this Court, similar language will cause future pleadings to be rejected without consideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hess, Gene R. Sr.; Hess, Gene R. Jr.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Plaque-mines, 25th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89KW-1667.

Denied. Relators’ request for mandamus is moot as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal has acted. However, we note that relators use offensive, discourteous and insulting language in referring to the trial judge and the court of appeal in violation of Louisiana Supreme Court Rule 7, § 7. Although we now decline to hold relators, pro se litigants, in contempt of this Court, similar language will cause future pleadings to be rejected without consideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 So. 2d 1327, 1989 La. LEXIS 2597, 1989 WL 136516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hess-v-state-fourth-circuit-court-of-appeal-la-1989.