State Ex Rel. Hertzer v. Schuler

186 N.E. 808, 126 Ohio St. 630, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 630, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 358
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 31, 1933
Docket24021
StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.E. 808 (State Ex Rel. Hertzer v. Schuler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Hertzer v. Schuler, 186 N.E. 808, 126 Ohio St. 630, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 630, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 358 (Ohio 1933).

Opinion

By the Court.

No bill of exceptions has been filed in the case. The case therefore stands in this court with allegations of fact embodied in the answer denied by the reply, and without sufficient record to present *633 the assignments of error set forth in the petition in error.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed. Hilton v. State, ex rel. Bell, 108 Ohio St., 233, 140 N. E., 681, and Marriott v. Hawk, 111 Ohio St., 285, 145 N. E., 287.

Judgment affirmed.

Day, Allen, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. "Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marriott v. Hawk
145 N.E. 287 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.E. 808, 126 Ohio St. 630, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 630, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hertzer-v-schuler-ohio-1933.