State Ex Rel. Hertzer v. Schuler

186 N.E. 808, 126 Ohio St. 630, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 630, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 358
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 31, 1933·No. 24021·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

No bill of exceptions has been filed in the case. The case therefore stands in this court with allegations of fact embodied in the answer denied by the reply, and without sufficient record to present *633 the assignments of error set forth in the petition in error.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed. Hilton v. State, ex rel. Bell, 108 Ohio St., 233, 140 N. E., 681, and Marriott v. Hawk, 111 Ohio St., 285, 145 N. E., 287.

Judgment affirmed.

Day, Allen, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. "Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Hertzer v. Schuler, 186 N.E. 808, 126 Ohio St. 630, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 630, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 358 (Ohio 1933).

186 N.E. 808 (State Ex Rel. Hertzer v. Schuler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marriott v. Hawk
145 N.E. 287 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1924)