State ex rel. Henry v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Henry v. State

578 So. 2d 916, 1991 La. LEXIS 1167, 1991 WL 67487

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 26, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KH-0885

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 916 (State ex rel. Henry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Henry v. State, 578 So. 2d 916, 1991 La. LEXIS 1167, 1991 WL 67487 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Henry, Richard; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th [917]*917Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 2-82-223.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for new trial he has filed on or about March 7, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Henry, Richard; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th [917]*917Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 2-82-223.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for new trial he has filed on or about March 7, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 916, 1991 La. LEXIS 1167, 1991 WL 67487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-henry-v-state-la-1991.