State ex rel. Hendricks v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Hendricks v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

8 N.E.3d 961, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1490

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 2014·No. 2014-0329·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondents. Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On answer of respondents. Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

State ex rel. Hendricks v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 8 N.E.3d 961, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1490 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

8 N.E.3d 961 (State ex rel. Hendricks v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.