State ex rel. Heller v. Warden of Corr. Ctr. of NW Ohio

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: June 5, 2026
• Docket: L-26-00143
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Heller v. Warden of Corr. Ctr. of NW Ohio, 2026-Ohio-2117.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY

STATE EX REL. AMANDA HELLER COURT OF APPEALS NO. {48}L-26-00143

RELATOR

V.

WARDEN OF CORRECTIONS CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO

RESPONDENT

DECISION AND JUDGMENT

Decided: June 5, 2026

***** Kati E. Tharp, for relator.

*****

SULEK, J.

{¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the petition of relator Amanda Heller

requesting the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.

{¶ 2} The facts taken from Heller’s complaint are that on April 26, 2026, she was

charged by complaint with one count of felonious assault. She appeared the next day

before the Bryan Municipal Court, which set bond at $100,000, no ten percent allowed. She was further ordered to have no contact with the alleged victim. The case was then

bound over to the Williams County Court of Common Pleas.

{¶ 3} Heller posted the bond on April 27, 2026. Upon her release, she obtained

employment at the Lake Shake in Fremont, Indiana, and at the Farm House in Camden,

Michigan. Both locations are within a ten-minute drive from her home.

{¶ 4} Stemming from the same incident, on May 21, 2026, the Williams County

Grand Jury indicted Heller on one count of aggravated murder with a firearm

specification, one count of aggravated burglary with a firearm specification, one count of

domestic violence, and one count of discharging a firearm into a habitation with a firearm

specification. Upon being notified of the charges, Heller turned herself in to the

authorities.

{¶ 5} At her arraignment, the trial court expressed concern about Heller working

outside of the state. It set her bail at $500,000 cash or surety and ordered her not to leave

Ohio without the prior approval of the court. Heller has not posted the $500,000 bond.

She is currently being held in the Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio located in

Stryker, Williams County, Ohio.

{¶ 6} Heller now seeks a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that her bail is

excessive. Despite being held in Williams County, however, Heller filed her petition in

Lucas County. Because of that, this court lacks jurisdiction to determine her petition.

2. {¶ 7} R.C. 2725.03 provides,

If a person restrained of [her] liberty is an inmate of a state benevolent or correctional institution, the location of which is fixed by statute and at the time is in the custody of the officers of the institution, no court or judge other than the courts or judges of the county in which the institution is located has jurisdiction to issue or determine a writ of habeas corpus for [her] production or discharge. Any writ issued by a court or judge of another county to an officer or person in charge at the state institution to compel the production or discharge of an inmate thereof is void.

{¶ 8} In Brown v. Hall, 2009-Ohio-5592, the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the

judgment of the court of appeals and remanded the matter for it to be dismissed for lack

of jurisdiction. In that case, Brown was incarcerated in Richland County but filed his

habeas petition in Stark County. The Ohio Supreme Court held that “[e]ven though

Brown’s petition reached the same district court of appeals it would have had it been filed

in the correct county, the court of appeals still lacked jurisdiction to determine the merits

of Brown’s petition.” Brown at ¶ 1, citing Goudlock v. Voorhies, 2008-Ohio-4787, ¶ 17.

{¶ 9} Here, like Brown, even though Heller’s petition reached this court as it

would have if she had filed the petition in Williams County, because she instead filed it

in a county in which she is not incarcerated, this court lacks jurisdiction.

{¶ 10} Accordingly, upon due consideration, Heller’s petition for a writ of habeas

corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Any costs associated with this action are

assessed to Heller.

3. {¶ 11} The clerk is directed to serve upon all parties, within three days, a copy of

this decision in a manner prescribed by Civ.R. 5(B).

Writ dismissed.

Gene A. Zmuda, J. ____________________________ JUDGE Myron C. Duhart, J. ____________________________ Charles E. Sulek, J. JUDGE CONCUR. ____________________________ JUDGE

This decision is subject to further editing by the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Reporter of Decisions. Parties interested in viewing the final reported version are advised to visit the Ohio Supreme Court’s web site at: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/ROD/docs/.

4.