State ex rel. Heistand v. Ward

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Heistand v. Ward

207 N.E.2d 555, 2 Ohio St. 2d 174, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 324, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 519

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 19, 1965·No. No. 39167·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is the contention of respondents that the provision of Section 121.161, Eevised Code, above quoted, has no application unless the holidays in question fall on the usual working days, i. e., Monday to and including Friday, and, therefore, does not authorize holiday pay where the enumerated holidays fall on either Saturday or Sunday.

The provision of the statute is clear and contains no language, express or by inference, that it should not apply where any of the named holidays falls on Saturday or Sunday.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is the contention of respondents that the provision of Section 121.161, Eevised Code, above quoted, has no application unless the holidays in question fall on the usual working days, i. e., Monday to and including Friday, and, therefore, does not authorize holiday pay where the enumerated holidays fall on either Saturday or Sunday.

The provision of the statute is clear and contains no language, express or by inference, that it should not apply where any of the named holidays falls on Saturday or Sunday.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Heistand v. Ward, 207 N.E.2d 555, 2 Ohio St. 2d 174, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 324, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 519 (Ohio 1965).

Pincite

207 N.E.2d 555 (State ex rel. Heistand v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.