State ex rel. Heine v. Busher
This text of 164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 519 (State ex rel. Heine v. Busher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of prohibition will be awarded only where there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and will not be awarded as a substitute for an appeal. State, ex rel. Rhodes, Aud., v. Solether, Judge, 162 Ohio St., 559, 124 N. E. (2d), 411; State, ex rel. Winnefeld, v. Court of Common Pleas, 159 Ohio St., 225, 112 N. E. (2d), 27.
Appellant has an adequate remedy by way of appeal.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-heine-v-busher-ohio-1956.