State ex rel. Heights Jewish Center v. Haake

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 547
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 21, 1956·No. No. 34886·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment, on the ground that relator did not file a bill of exceptions or have it allowed and signed by the Court of Appeals, the trial court in this cause.

There being no bill of exceptions before this court exemplifying the facts necessary in determining the issues presented, the appeal is dismissed. State, ex rel. Novak, v. Bright, ante, 363, 135 N. E. (2d), 408; In re Williams, ante, 511.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Heights Jewish Center v. Haake, 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 547 (Ohio 1956).

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 547 (State ex rel. Heights Jewish Center v. Haake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.