State ex rel. Heddings v. Superintendent of Maryland State Reformatory for Males

193 Md. 722
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 5, 1949·No. H. C. No. 8·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was charged [723] with robbery and counsel was appointed to represent him. He elected a trial by jury, was found guilty and given an indeterminate sentence not to exceed five years. He complains that he was convicted on perjured testimony, that he lacked witnesses who were not available at the time of trial, that he was convicted on circumstantial evidence plus his past record, that he was innocent and that it was a case of “mistaken identity”. None of these allegations is sufficient to establish a denial of constitutional rights. As we have repeatedly said, an application for habeas corpus may not be made to serve the purpose of an appeal.

Application denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Heddings v. Superintendent of Maryland State Reformatory for Males, 193 Md. 722 (Md. 1949).

193 Md. 722 (State ex rel. Heddings v. Superintendent of Maryland State Reformatory for Males) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
126 A.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)