State ex rel. Hebert v. State

883 So. 2d 1003, 2004 La. LEXIS 2698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Hebert v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 883 So. 2d 1003
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 1, 2004·No. No. 2003-KH-2474·Published

Opinion

In re Hebert, Edward J.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 79770; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 03-00296.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because the terms of the statutes under which relator was sentenced do not include a prohibition on diminution of sentence pursuant to R.S. 15:571.3, see R.S. 14:31, relator’s sentence is amended to delete the prohibition. Relator’s eligibility is to be determined by the Department of Corrections pursuant to R.S. 15:571.3. State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 661; cf. State ex rel. Meeks v. State, 98-1930 (La.1/29/99), 736 So.2d 820; St. Amant v. 19th J.D.C., 94-0567 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 536. The district court is directed to make an entry in the minutes reflecting this change. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Hebert v. State, 883 So. 2d 1003, 2004 La. LEXIS 2698 (La. 2004).

883 So. 2d 1003 (State ex rel. Hebert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Simmons v. Stalder
666 So. 2d 661 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State Ex Rel. Meeks v. State
736 So. 2d 820 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)
St. Amant v. 19TH JUDICIAL DIST. COURT
678 So. 2d 536 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)