State Ex Rel. Heavelow v. Frederick

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Heavelow v. Frederick

167 So. 41, 123 Fla. 617, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1022

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State Ex Rel. Heavelow v. Frederick. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 Fla. 494 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 31, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on motion for peremptory writ of mandamus, the return notwithstanding.

The return was entered subsequent to an opinion filed herein on November 4, 1935, in which the law of the case was enunciated. The return of the Respondent is insufficient to constitute a defense to the alternative writ.

The motion for peremptory writ, the return notwithstanding, is granted and it is directed that the peremptory writ do now issue.

So ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on motion for peremptory writ of mandamus, the return notwithstanding.

The return was entered subsequent to an opinion filed herein on November 4, 1935, in which the law of the case was enunciated. The return of the Respondent is insufficient to constitute a defense to the alternative writ.

The motion for peremptory writ, the return notwithstanding, is granted and it is directed that the peremptory writ do now issue.

So ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

State Ex Rel. Heavelow v. Frederick, 167 So. 41, 123 Fla. 617, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1022 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

167 So. 41 (State Ex Rel. Heavelow v. Frederick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.