State ex rel. Hays v. Judge of the Fifth District Court
This text of 25 La. Ann. 616 (State ex rel. Hays v. Judge of the Fifth District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question presented in this proceeding is, whether or not the lower court can order the execution of a judgment, from which a suspensive appeal has been taken, because the appellant fails to produce and justify his surety on the trial of a rule taken by the appellee for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of the bond. Or, in other words, if when called on, the appellant does not adduce proof affirmatively to show that his surety is good, and no evidence to impeach him is offered, can the lower judge presume him to be insufficient, and order execution to issue ?
It is now the jurisprudence of this court that he can not, because some proof is necessary to destroy the presumption arising from the acceptance of the bond with the surety signing it. See 22 An. 592; 23 An. 714.
It is therefore ordered that the prohibition herein be made perpetual with costs, and without prejudice to appellee’s right to impeach the surety on the appeal bond.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 La. Ann. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hays-v-judge-of-the-fifth-district-court-la-1873.