State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn
This text of 121 N.W. 898 (State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conceding that relator properly raised the question by appearing specially and objecting to the petition, there is no merit in the claim that the description of the lands was defective. A description of the lands proposed to be drained is all the statute requires. This does not mean a description by subdivision to correspond with individual ownership; and if an entire section is within the-district, it may be described as a section, although the subdivisions are owned by different persons.
Writ discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 N.W. 898, 108 Minn. 528, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hassing-v-quinn-minn-1909.