State ex rel. Hassan v. Gen. Motors Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Hassan v. Gen. Motors Corp.

1999 Ohio 377, 85 Ohio St. 3d 340

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 1999

Docket1998-2020

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 377 (State ex rel. Hassan v. Gen. Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hassan v. Gen. Motors Corp., 1999 Ohio 377, 85 Ohio St. 3d 340 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 340.]

THE STATE EX REL. HASSAN, APPELLANT, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Hassan v. Gen. Motors Corp., 1999-Ohio-377.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2020—Submitted February 23, 1999—Decided April 21, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD08-1063. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P. and Julie M. Larson, for appellee General Motors Corp. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Virginia Egan Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 340.]

THE STATE EX REL. HASSAN, APPELLANT, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Hassan v. Gen. Motors Corp., 1999-Ohio-377.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2020—Submitted February 23, 1999—Decided April 21, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD08-1063. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P. and Julie M. Larson, for appellee General Motors Corp. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Virginia Egan Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 377, 85 Ohio St. 3d 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hassan-v-gen-motors-corp-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack