State Ex Rel. Hartung v. Village of Monroeville

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Hartung v. Village of Monroeville

7 N.E.2d 801, 132 Ohio St. 386, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 386, 8 Ohio Op. 187, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 247

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 14, 1937

Docket26211

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.E.2d 801 (State Ex Rel. Hartung v. Village of Monroeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Hartung v. Village of Monroeville, 7 N.E.2d 801, 132 Ohio St. 386, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 386, 8 Ohio Op. 187, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 247 (Ohio 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause was submitted to the court upon the petition, the answer, and demurrer thereto, and upon the written statement of defendant’s counsel, filed in the case, wherein it is conceded that the demurrer to the answer is well taken; on consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the said demurrer be and the same hereby is sustained; and the said defendants not desiring to further plead, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same hereby is, allowed and said defendants, the Mayor, and the village Council of the village of Monroeville are hereby commanded forthwith to proceed to make improvements, corree *387 tions and changes' in the location, protection and construction of the water supply and water works system of the village of Monroeville, satisfactory to the Director of Health so as to provide a water supply not subject to the danger of contamination, and to do all things necessary and proper effectually to carry out and comply with the order of the relator served on said defendants on April 12, 1935.

Demurrer sustained and writ allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause was submitted to the court upon the petition, the answer, and demurrer thereto, and upon the written statement of defendant’s counsel, filed in the case, wherein it is conceded that the demurrer to the answer is well taken; on consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the said demurrer be and the same hereby is sustained; and the said defendants not desiring to further plead, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same hereby is, allowed and said defendants, the Mayor, and the village Council of the village of Monroeville are hereby commanded forthwith to proceed to make improvements, corree *387 tions and changes' in the location, protection and construction of the water supply and water works system of the village of Monroeville, satisfactory to the Director of Health so as to provide a water supply not subject to the danger of contamination, and to do all things necessary and proper effectually to carry out and comply with the order of the relator served on said defendants on April 12, 1935.

Demurrer sustained and writ allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.E.2d 801, 132 Ohio St. 386, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 386, 8 Ohio Op. 187, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hartung-v-village-of-monroeville-ohio-1937.