State Ex Rel. Harris v. King

183 So. 926, 134 Fla. 58
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 926 (State Ex Rel. Harris v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Harris v. King, 183 So. 926, 134 Fla. 58 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in this case is addressed tcv an order of the Circuit Judge granting the motion of the respondents, defendants in error here, to quash the writ of quo warranto which had been sued out by the relators, plaintiffs in error here. The case has been very ably briefed and argued by counsel for the respective parties. Upon consideration of the transcript of record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the order and judgment of the court below must be affirmed upon the authority of the recent decision of this Court in the case of State, ex rel. Wurn, et al., v. Kasserman, et al., 131 Fla. 234, 179 So. 410.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Wurn v. Kasserman
179 So. 410 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 926, 134 Fla. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-harris-v-king-fla-1938.