State ex rel. Harper v. Clarke

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Harper v. Clarke

205 So. 2d 529, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3384

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 19, 1967·No. No. 36858·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Rule Nisi in Quo Warranto having heretofore issued in this cause, and argument having been heard, and the matter having now been considered on the record, briefs and argument, and it appearing to the court that the petition is without merit, the Rule Nisi heretofore issued is discharged and the [530]*530cause dismissed, under the authority of State ex rel. Hardie v. Coleman, 1934, 115 Fla. 119, 155 So. 129, 92 A.L.R. 988.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rule Nisi in Quo Warranto having heretofore issued in this cause, and argument having been heard, and the matter having now been considered on the record, briefs and argument, and it appearing to the court that the petition is without merit, the Rule Nisi heretofore issued is discharged and the [530]*530cause dismissed, under the authority of State ex rel. Hardie v. Coleman, 1934, 115 Fla. 119, 155 So. 129, 92 A.L.R. 988.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

State ex rel. Harper v. Clarke, 205 So. 2d 529, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3384 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

205 So. 2d 529 (State ex rel. Harper v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related