State ex rel. Harman v. Cacioppo

736 N.E.2d 901, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 90 Ohio St. 1438, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2655
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 18, 2000
Docket00-1424
StatusPublished

This text of 736 N.E.2d 901 (State ex rel. Harman v. Cacioppo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Harman v. Cacioppo, 736 N.E.2d 901, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 90 Ohio St. 1438, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2655 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 N.E.2d 901, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 90 Ohio St. 1438, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-harman-v-cacioppo-ohio-2000.