State Ex Rel. Hardin v. Sadler

47 P. 450, 23 Nev. 356
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 5, 1897
DocketNo. 1488.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 47 P. 450 (State Ex Rel. Hardin v. Sadler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Hardin v. Sadler, 47 P. 450, 23 Nev. 356 (Neb. 1897).

Opinion

By the Court,

Belknap, C. J.:

This is an application for a writ of mandamus requiring respondent to commission relator as lieutenant-governor of the state. The petition, among other things, alleges that the Honorable John E. Jones, the duly elected governor of the state, died upon the 10th day of April, 1896; that thereupon the powers and duties of the office of governor devolved upon respondent, the lieutenant-governor, who is now the acting governor of the state; that at the last general election relator was the candidate of the Silver party and of the Democratic party for the office of lieutenant-governor, and received the highest number of votes cast for any candidate for that office and was elected. A demand upon and refusal by respondent to issue a certificate of election are alleged, and this court is asked to issue a writ of mandamus requiring him to do so. The attorney-general has- demurred to the petition upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to entitle relator to the relief prayed for.

The provisions of the constitution bearing upon the subject are as follows (article V):

“Sec. 17. A lieutenant-governor shall be elected at the same time and places, and in the same manner, as the governor, and his term of office and eligibility shall also be the same, tie shall be president of the senate, but shall have only a casting vote therein. If during a vacancy in the office of governor, the lieutenant-governor shall be impeached, displaced, resign, die, or become incapable of performing the duties of the office, or be absent from the state, the president *358 pro tempore of the senate shall act as governor until the vacancy be filled or the disability cease.
Sec. 18. In case of the impeachment of the governor, or his removal from office, death, inability to discharge the duties of the said office, resignation, or absence from the state, the powers and duties of the office shall devolve upon the lieutenant-governor for the residue of the term, or until the disability shall cease.”

The gubernatorial succession is covered by the foregoing provisions. If a vacancy occurs in the office of governor, the powers and duties of the office devolve upon the lieutenant-governor, but there is no vacancy created thereby in the office of lieutenant-governor. The officer remains lieutenant-governor, but invested with the powers and duties of governor.

Again, if, during a vacancy of the office of governor, the lieutenant-governor becomes incapable of discharging the duties of the office of governor from any of the causes enumerated in the constitution — in other words, if a vacancy exists in both the offices of governor and lieutenant-governor, the president pro tempore of the senate acts as governor until the vacancy be filled or the disability cease. (People ex rel. Lynch v. Budd, 45 Pac. 1060.)

There being no vacancy in the office of lieutenant-governor, the demurrer must be sustained, and the writ dismissed.

■ It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayer v. D'ORTONA
184 A.2d 582 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
State Ex Rel. De Concini v. Garvey
195 P.2d 153 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1948)
State ex rel. Martin v. Ekern
280 N.W. 393 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1938)
Rouse v. Johnson
28 S.W.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)
Fitzpatrick v. McAlister
1926 OK 584 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Olcott v. Hoff
181 P. 466 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1919)
Futrell v. Oldham
155 S.W. 502 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1913)
People ex rel. Parks v. Cornforth
34 Colo. 107 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1905)
State ex rel. Chatterton v. Grant
73 P. 470 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 P. 450, 23 Nev. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hardin-v-sadler-nev-1897.