State Ex Rel. Hardaway Contracting Co. v. Lee

21 So. 2d 211, 155 Fla. 724, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 633
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 21 So. 2d 211 (State Ex Rel. Hardaway Contracting Co. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Hardaway Contracting Co. v. Lee, 21 So. 2d 211, 155 Fla. 724, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 633 (Fla. 1945).

Opinion

TERRELL, J.:

The Legislature of 1935 enacted Chapter 17178 imposing a license tax of $1000 on certain firms and corporations as a prerequisite to doing, business in Florida. In Lee, Comptroller v. Bigsby Electric Company, 136 Fla. 305, 186 So. 505, this Court held Chapter 17178 unconstitutional. The Legislature of 1943 enacted Chapter 22008 authorizing the Comptroller to make refund of moneys paid into the State treasury when no tax, license, or account is due or when any payment was made into the State treasury in error.

The relator having paid into the State treasury the sum of $4000 as license taxes under Chapter 17178, Acts of 1935, before it was declared invalid and considering that it was entitled to refund under Chapter 22008 brought this action in mandamus to require the Comptroller to draw his warrant to cover, such refund or to show cause why he refuses to do so. To the alternative writ, there was a return and motion to quash in which it is contended, (1) that no plain and positive duty is imposed on the Comptroller to perform the acts sought to be coerced, (2) Relator has another and more adequate remedy, (3) Relator has forfeited his right by laches, and (4) the Act sought to be coerced is not within the power of respondent to perform.

It is not denied that Relator paid the license tax to the State under Chapter 17178 which it claims should now be refunded under Chapter 22008; neither is there any question that the amount claimed was paid into the “county school fund” as provided by the former Act. We are of the view that relator’s application for refund was properly and timely made and that the allegations of the alternative writ bring him within the class entitled to refund under Chapter 22008.

*726 Chapter 22008 provides for refunds in three different categories, to‘-wit: (a) In case of an overpayment of any tax, license, or account due,. (b) a payment when no tax, license, or account is due, and (c) any payment made into the State treasury in error, and appropriates “from the proper respective funds from time to time such sums as may be necessary for such refunds.” Since Chapter 17178 was declared to be a nullity, relator may claim his refund under category b and c of Chapter 22008.

The “County School Fund” into which the amount sought to be recovered was paid is defined by Section 9, Article XII of the Constitution. It is not necessary to recite here the . moneys that go into this fund. It is sufficient to say that it profited very materially under Chapter 17178, that large sums pass into this fund annually through the hands of the Comptroller and that it was the purpose of the Legislature that any- refunds allowed under Chapter 22008 be made by warrant of the Comptroller drawn on the fund benefitted by the original payment, in this case the County School Fund.

So the motion for peremptory writ, is granted notwithstanding the return.

It.is so ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ„ concur. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarnoff v. FLA. DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES
825 So. 2d 351 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Newsweek, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
522 U.S. 442 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Osceola v. Florida Department of Revenue
705 F. Supp. 1552 (S.D. Florida, 1989)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1978
State ex rel. C. P. O. Mess v. Green
174 So. 2d 546 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
State Ex Rel. Badgett v. Lee
22 So. 2d 804 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 So. 2d 211, 155 Fla. 724, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hardaway-contracting-co-v-lee-fla-1945.