Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

660 N.E.2d 740, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1520, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 Ohio St. 3d 44 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 13, 1996·No. 96-369·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the respondent is prohibited from proceeding to conduct a hearing or engage in further proceeding related to the protests against the candidacies of relators, pending disposition of this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file their merit briefs on or before February 20,1996. No extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be permitted.

[1521]*1521Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur and would also invite the Secretary of State to intervene. Pfeifer, J., concurs in part because he would not stay the hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 660 N.E.2d 740, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1520, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3796 (Ohio 1996).

660 N.E.2d 740 (State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.