State ex rel. Hanley v. District Court of the First Judicial District ex rel. County of Lewis & Clark

304 P.2d 620, 130 Mont. 633, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 66
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 1956
DocketNo. 9768
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 304 P.2d 620 (State ex rel. Hanley v. District Court of the First Judicial District ex rel. County of Lewis & Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hanley v. District Court of the First Judicial District ex rel. County of Lewis & Clark, 304 P.2d 620, 130 Mont. 633, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 66 (Mo. 1956).

Opinions

ME. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN and DAVIS.

Eelator has applied for a writ of Supervisory Control or other-appropriate writ to review the action of the Respondent Court and the Hon. E. E. Fenton, the judge presiding therein, in denying his application for a recount of the votes cast in the general election held on November 6, 1956, for the respective candidates for District Judge. While this has been recognized by this court as an appropriate method of reviewing the order of the Respondent Court, yet the Writ of Supervisory Control is a discretionary Writ—does not issue as a matter of course—In re Weston, 28 Mont. 207, 72 Pac. 512—and will not be issued when the application shows on its face that the Trial Judge and Respondent Court were and are not in error on the ruling made.

Such is the proceeding here and accordingly the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mufich
532 P.2d 1301 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 P.2d 620, 130 Mont. 633, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hanley-v-district-court-of-the-first-judicial-district-ex-mont-1956.