Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State ex rel. Hanemann v. Wingfield

State ex rel. Hanemann v. Wingfield

202 So. 2d 131, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 21, 1967
DocketNo. J-179
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 So. 2d 131 (State ex rel. Hanemann v. Wingfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hanemann v. Wingfield, 202 So. 2d 131, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition was filed in this court on July 19, 1967, praying for a writ and stay order to stop a trial to be had in Volusia County on July 24, 1967. The State Attorney for Volusia County has not had time to nor has he filed any response to the Suggestion for the writ, and we do not think it necessary, for a study of the filed Suggestion and the decisions of the Florida Supreme Court1 and the Second District Court of Appeal, reveals that the Suggestion for the writ is not well founded in law. We think, and so hold, that the decision rendered by the Second District Court of Appeal in State of Florida v. Lowe, 130 So.2d 288, is controlling in the instant case and the Suggestion for the Writ of Prohibition is hereby denied.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanemann v. State
221 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 So. 2d 131, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hanemann-v-wingfield-fladistctapp-1967.