State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas

920 N.E.2d 371, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1440
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2010
Docket2009-2068
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 920 N.E.2d 371 (State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 920 N.E.2d 371, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1440 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Prohibition. On relator’s motion to dismiss and motion for leave to file supplemental affidavits, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and motion of County Commissioners Association of Ohio for leave to intervene. Motion for leave to intervene is granted. Motion for leave to file supplemental affidavits is granted. Motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings are denied.

Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after filing of respondents’ brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 N.E.2d 371, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hamilton-cty-bd-of-commrs-v-hamilton-cty-court-of-common-ohio-2010.