Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas

State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas

918 N.E.2d 527, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1526
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Ohio St. 3d 1440 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 17, 2009·No. 2009-2068·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney Joseph T. Deters’s motion for leave to intervene as respondent,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for leave to intervene is granted. The answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings that is attached to the motion for leave to intervene is deemed filed.

Relator shall file a response to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, which is attached to the intervening respondent’s motion for leave to intervene, within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 918 N.E.2d 527, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1526 (Ohio 2009).

918 N.E.2d 527 (State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.