State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas

918 N.E.2d 527, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1526

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 17, 2009

Docket2009-2068

StatusPublished

This text of 918 N.E.2d 527 (State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 918 N.E.2d 527, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1526 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney Joseph T. Deters’s motion for leave to intervene as respondent,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for leave to intervene is granted. The answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings that is attached to the motion for leave to intervene is deemed filed.

Relator shall file a response to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, which is attached to the intervening respondent’s motion for leave to intervene, within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney Joseph T. Deters’s motion for leave to intervene as respondent,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for leave to intervene is granted. The answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings that is attached to the motion for leave to intervene is deemed filed.

Relator shall file a response to the motion for judgment on the pleadings, which is attached to the intervening respondent’s motion for leave to intervene, within ten days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

918 N.E.2d 527, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hamilton-cty-bd-of-commrs-v-hamilton-cty-court-of-common-ohio-2009.