State ex rel. Ham v. Court of Appeals

823 N.E.2d 455, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1449
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 2, 2005
Docket2004-2105
StatusPublished

This text of 823 N.E.2d 455 (State ex rel. Ham v. Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Ham v. Court of Appeals, 823 N.E.2d 455, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motions to dismiss. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 N.E.2d 455, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ham-v-court-of-appeals-ohio-2005.