State ex rel. Ham v. Court of Appeals

823 N.E.2d 455, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1449
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 2, 2005·No. 2004-2105·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motions to dismiss. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ham v. Court of Appeals, 823 N.E.2d 455, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2005).

823 N.E.2d 455 (State ex rel. Ham v. Court of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.