State ex rel. Hallisy v. Voorhies

33 La. Ann. 832
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1881
DocketNo. 8314
StatusPublished

This text of 33 La. Ann. 832 (State ex rel. Hallisy v. Voorhies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hallisy v. Voorhies, 33 La. Ann. 832 (La. 1881).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

Considering that, under the showing made, the defendant judge should have heard and passed upon the evidence seasonably offered by the relator on the trial of the exception to the jurisdiction of the court rations material, to show that the value of the things in dispute exceeds one hundred dollars, and that no further proceedings should be had in the case until after the evidence shall have been heard and the exception passed upon, C. P. 857, 333, Const. Art. 90, 32 An. 549, 553,

It is ordered that the decree of the City Court overruling the exception be avoided and set aside; that the exception be reinstated and set for trial; that the defendant judge be directed to hear the evidence offered by the relator in the ease mentioned in the petition, and after hearing the same, to pass upon the exception in conformity with law, and that the prohibition herein issued in limine be perpetuated at defendant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 La. Ann. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hallisy-v-voorhies-la-1881.