State Ex Rel. Halliday v. Court of Appeals of Eighth Judicial District
This text of 16 N.E.2d 260 (State Ex Rel. Halliday v. Court of Appeals of Eighth Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On March 30, 1938, the relator filed in this court a petition to prohibit the Court of Appeals of the Eighth Appellate District and a receiver appointed in a foreclosure proceeding, from acting further in three cases which were pending in that court on appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county.
An answer filed in the prohibition proceeding in this court pleads among other allegations, that the relator has an adequate remedy by appeal from the judgments of the Court of Appeals in those cases, and a supplemental answer pleads that the relator prosecuted appeals to this court which sustained motions to dismiss the appeals as of right and overruled motions to certify the records on May 18,1938.
The respondents moved to dismiss the petition for a writ of prohibition.
The relator had an adequate remedy by appeal and he availed himself of that remedy in all three cases.
*192 The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the petition for a writ of prohibition is dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 N.E.2d 260, 134 Ohio St. 191, 134 Ohio St. (N.S.) 191, 11 Ohio Op. 595, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-halliday-v-court-of-appeals-of-eighth-judicial-district-ohio-1938.