State ex rel. Hall v. Sutula

2023 Ohio 1676
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 16, 2023
Docket112494
StatusPublished

This text of 2023 Ohio 1676 (State ex rel. Hall v. Sutula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hall v. Sutula, 2023 Ohio 1676 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Hall v. Sutula, 2023-Ohio-1676.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE EX REL., MAYSHAUN HALL, :

Relator, : No. 112494 v. :

HON. KATHLEEN SUTULA, :

Respondent. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: WRIT DISMISSED DATED: May 16, 2023

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 563405 Order No. 563895

Appearances:

Russell S. Bensing, for relator.

Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. Moss, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, P.J.:

On March 9, 2023, the relator, Mayshaun Hall, commenced this

mandamus action against the respondent, Judge Kathleen Sutula, to compel the

judge to rule on a motion to withdraw guilty plea, which he filed on May 2, 2022, in the underlying case, State v. Hall, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-19-637420-A. On April 5,

2023, the respondent judge moved for summary judgment on the grounds of

mootness. Attached to the dispositive motion was a copy of a certified journal entry,

file stamped March 31, 2023, denying the subject motion. Hall has not filed a

response, and the court notes that he appealed the subject ruling on April 18, 2023,

State v. Hall, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 112626. The March 31, 2023 journal entry

establishes that Hall has received his requested relief and that the respondent judge

has fulfilled her duty to rule on the subject motion. This writ action is moot.

Accordingly, this court grants the respondent judge’s motion for

summary judgment and dismisses this mandamus action. Respondent to pay costs;

costs waived. This court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties notice of the

judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

Writ dismissed.

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, PRESIDING JUDGE

EMANUELLA D. GROVES, J., and MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 Ohio 1676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hall-v-sutula-ohioctapp-2023.