State ex rel. Hall v. McGill

40 N.E. 1115, 12 Ind. App. 665, 1895 Ind. App. LEXIS 170
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 6, 1895
DocketNo. 1,725
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 N.E. 1115 (State ex rel. Hall v. McGill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hall v. McGill, 40 N.E. 1115, 12 Ind. App. 665, 1895 Ind. App. LEXIS 170 (Ind. Ct. App. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

The appellant presents a motion to be permitted to substitute an amended complaint, the original of such amended complaint having been lost, as shown by affidavits submitted. The object of the motion is to place the record in condition to enable the appellant to move for a writ of certiorari, it being asserted that the amended complaint is not correctly copied into the transcript t>y the clerk. We are of opinion that this court has no power to grant leave to file substituted pleadings that were lost in the court below, but that the the appellant must seek relief in the trial court.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koeneman v. Aldridge
122 N.E.2d 345 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1954)
Mackey v. Lafayette Loan & Trust Co.
121 N.E. 682 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 N.E. 1115, 12 Ind. App. 665, 1895 Ind. App. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hall-v-mcgill-indctapp-1895.