State Ex Rel. Hall v. District Court
This text of 115 P.2d 92 (State Ex Rel. Hall v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER.
In this matter, opinion in which may be found in 109 Mont. 228, 95 Pac. (2d) 438, the alternative writ of supervisory control was quashed after respondents had filed concurrently a motion to quash and also an answer and return, in accordance with the established practice in this court. Subsequently the respondents filed a cost bill in the total amount of $92.21, of which $18 was for the district court clerk’s fee for preparing the original transcript of the proceedings for certification to this court, itemized as 180 folios at 10<á per folio, and $32 was for three copies thereof at 5^ per folio each. Subsequently relators filed motions to tax costs, and specific objections to the two above items for transcript, totaling $50.
"We find no valid objection to the cost bill, except that the total cost for preparing the transcript is fixed by section 4918, Revised Codes, at 15^ per folio, which, at the 180 folios claimed, amount relators do not question, amounts to $27, instead of the $50 claimed, making a reduction of $23.
Section 9796, Revised Codes, allowing, on review other than by appeal, the same costs as on appeal, the $92.21 claimed by the cost bill is hereby reduced to $69.21, and judgment therefor ordered in respondents’ favor against the relators.
Howard A. Johnson, Chief Justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 P.2d 92, 111 Mont. 619, 1941 Mont. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hall-v-district-court-mont-1941.