Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Hairston v. McMonagle

State ex rel. Hairston v. McMonagle

680 N.E.2d 1018, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1443, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2084
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 2, 1997
Docket97-804
StatusPublished

This text of 680 N.E.2d 1018 (State ex rel. Hairston v. McMonagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hairston v. McMonagle, 680 N.E.2d 1018, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1443, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2084 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant the writ of mandamus and order the judge to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 N.E.2d 1018, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1443, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hairston-v-mcmonagle-ohio-1997.