State ex rel. Hague v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Hague v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1412

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 6, 2009·No. 2009-1583·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within ten days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within seven days of the filing of the evidence; respondents’ shall file a brief within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within three days after filing of respondents’ brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within ten days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within seven days of the filing of the evidence; respondents’ shall file a brief within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within three days after filing of respondents’ brief.

State ex rel. Hague v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

914 N.E.2d 409 (State ex rel. Hague v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related