State ex rel. Hague v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1412
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 6, 2009
Docket2009-1583
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 914 N.E.2d 409 (State ex rel. Hague v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hague v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within ten days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within seven days of the filing of the evidence; respondents’ shall file a brief within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within three days after filing of respondents’ brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hague-v-ashtabula-cty-bd-of-commrs-ohio-2009.